[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] st/mesa: also try PIPE_FORMAT_R10G10B10A2_UNORM for GL_RGB10

[Matt Turner]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> Yes, sorry, thought that was implied since I had given it earlier
>>> pending my (as it turns out, incorrect) suggestion.
>>
>> A number of people have been confused (rightly so) by "LGTM" implying
>> Reviewed-by. Let's please not ever start implying or inferring
>> Reviewed-bys from anything less than a reply actually saying
>> Reviewed-by in the format expected to go into the commit message.
>
> Well, I had supplied it before, conditional on a (seemingly at the
> time) trivial change. Then I agreed that my condition was wrong. I
> thought that qualified as "good enough" to not have to re-give the
> R-b.

Ah, right. I only saw your second reply, and not the first with the R-b.