[PATCH v3 24/27] drm/msm/dpu: rework plane CSC setting
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Tue Feb 7 20:57:09 UTC 2023
On 2/7/2023 12:44 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 22:05, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/3/2023 10:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Rework the code flushing CSC settings for the plane. Separate out the
>>> pipe and pipe_cfg as a preparation for r_pipe support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 45 +++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
>>> index e69499490d39..05047192cb37 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
>>> @@ -576,29 +576,18 @@ static const struct dpu_csc_cfg dpu_csc10_YUV2RGB_601L = {
>>> { 0x00, 0x3ff, 0x00, 0x3ff, 0x00, 0x3ff,},
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static const struct dpu_csc_cfg *_dpu_plane_get_csc(struct dpu_plane *pdpu, const struct dpu_format *fmt)
>>> +static const struct dpu_csc_cfg *_dpu_plane_get_csc(struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe, const struct dpu_format *fmt)
>>> {
>>> - struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(pdpu->base.state);
>>> const struct dpu_csc_cfg *csc_ptr;
>>>
>>> - if (!pdpu) {
>>> - DPU_ERROR("invalid plane\n");
>>> - return NULL;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> if (!DPU_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt))
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> - if (BIT(DPU_SSPP_CSC_10BIT) & pstate->pipe.sspp->cap->features)
>>> + if (BIT(DPU_SSPP_CSC_10BIT) & pipe->sspp->cap->features)
>>> csc_ptr = &dpu_csc10_YUV2RGB_601L;
>>> else
>>> csc_ptr = &dpu_csc_YUV2RGB_601L;
>>>
>>> - DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "using 0x%X 0x%X 0x%X...\n",
>>> - csc_ptr->csc_mv[0],
>>> - csc_ptr->csc_mv[1],
>>> - csc_ptr->csc_mv[2]);
>>> -
>>> return csc_ptr;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1049,6 +1038,27 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void dpu_plane_flush_csc(struct dpu_plane *pdpu, struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct dpu_format *format = to_dpu_format(msm_framebuffer_format(pdpu->base.state->fb));
>>> + const struct dpu_csc_cfg *csc_ptr;
>>> +
>>> + if (!pipe->sspp || !pipe->sspp->ops.setup_csc)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + csc_ptr = _dpu_plane_get_csc(pipe, format);
>>> + if (!csc_ptr)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "using 0x%X 0x%X 0x%X...\n",
>>> + csc_ptr->csc_mv[0],
>>> + csc_ptr->csc_mv[1],
>>> + csc_ptr->csc_mv[2]);
>>> +
>>> + pipe->sspp->ops.setup_csc(pipe->sspp, csc_ptr);
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void dpu_plane_flush(struct drm_plane *plane)
>>> {
>>> struct dpu_plane *pdpu;
>>> @@ -1072,13 +1082,8 @@ void dpu_plane_flush(struct drm_plane *plane)
>>> else if (pdpu->color_fill & DPU_PLANE_COLOR_FILL_FLAG)
>>> /* force 100% alpha */
>>> _dpu_plane_color_fill(pdpu, pdpu->color_fill, 0xFF);
>>> - else if (pstate->pipe.sspp && pstate->pipe.sspp->ops.setup_csc) {
>>> - const struct dpu_format *fmt = to_dpu_format(msm_framebuffer_format(plane->state->fb));
>>> - const struct dpu_csc_cfg *csc_ptr = _dpu_plane_get_csc(pdpu, fmt);
>>> -
>>> - if (csc_ptr)
>>> - pstate->pipe.sspp->ops.setup_csc(pstate->pipe.sspp, csc_ptr);
>>> - }
>>
>> Do we need to check for pipe being valid too (pstate->pipe) &&
>> (pstate->pipe.sspp) && pstate->pipe.sspp->ops.setup_csc) ?
>>
>> Before moving the pipe_hw/sw pipe to the state the code used to check
>> for pdpu->pipe_hw to be valid. Since dpu_plane_flush() can be called
>> from other files too , dont we need to check for (pstate->pipe)?
>
> pstate->pipe is not a pointer, there is nothing to check.
Ah my bad. Only pipe.sspp is a pointer which you are already checking.
In that case,
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>
>
>>
>>> + else
>>> + dpu_plane_flush_csc(pdpu, &pstate->pipe);
>>>
>>> /* flag h/w flush complete */
>>> if (plane->state)
>
>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list