[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC reg capture

[Teres Alexis, Alan Previn]

So i do have one request - but its a nit - for the following case, should it be a guc_warn instead of a guc_dbg?
(last hunk in this patch)
	"No register capture node found for 0x%04X / 0x%08X\n",
	ce->guc_id.id, ce->lrc.lrca);"

Otherwise LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>

On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:11 -0800, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> 
> Update a bunch more debug prints to use the new GT based scheme.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c    | 51 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> index fc3b994626a4f..5f6e3594dda62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@

alan:snip