[PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for NV1x

Quan, Evan Evan.Quan at amd.com
Thu Jul 22 08:33:42 UTC 2021


[AMD Official Use Only]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar at amd.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 4:10 PM
> To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings
> properly for NV1x
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/22/2021 8:50 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
> > The customized OD settings can be divided into two parts: those
> > committed ones and non-committed ones.
> >    - For those changes which had been fed to SMU before S3/S4/Runpm
> >      suspend kicked, they are committed changes. They should be properly
> >      restored and fed to SMU on S3/S4/Runpm resume.
> >    - For those non-committed changes, they are restored only without
> feeding
> >      to SMU.
> >
> > Change-Id: Iea7cf7908dfcd919a4d0205e10bff91b1149a440
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h       |  8 +++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c     |  9 ++++
> >   .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c   | 52
> ++++++++++++++-----
> >   .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c    | 12 +++++
> >   4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > index 3e89852e4820..8ba53f16d2d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ struct smu_user_dpm_profile {
> >   	uint32_t power_limit;
> >   	uint32_t fan_speed_percent;
> >   	uint32_t flags;
> > +	uint32_t committed_od;
> >
> >   	/* user clock state information */
> >   	uint32_t clk_mask[SMU_CLK_COUNT];
> > @@ -352,6 +353,7 @@ struct smu_table_context
> >
> >   	void				*overdrive_table;
> >   	void                            *boot_overdrive_table;
> > +	void				*committed_overdrive_table;
> 
> May be rename it to user_overdrive_table - OD table with user settings?
[Quan, Evan] Actually "overdrive_table " is  the user_overdrive_table. It contains all the modification including those not committed( the commit is performed by echo "c" > /sys/class/drm/card1/device/pp_od_clk_voltage).
The new member added refers to those user customized but committed only settings. That's why it was named as " committed_overdrive_table". Any good suggestion for the naming?
> 
> >   	uint32_t			gpu_metrics_table_size;
> >   	void				*gpu_metrics_table;
> > @@ -623,6 +625,12 @@ struct pptable_funcs {
> >   				 enum PP_OD_DPM_TABLE_COMMAND
> type,
> >   				 long *input, uint32_t size);
> >
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @restore_committed_od_settings: Restore the customized and
> committed
> > +	 *                                 OD settings on S3/S4/Runpm resume.
> > +	 */
> > +	int (*restore_committed_od_settings)(struct smu_context *smu);
> > +
> >   	/**
> >   	 * @get_clock_by_type_with_latency: Get the speed and latency of
> a clock
> >   	 *                                  domain.
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > index ebe672142808..5f7d98e99f76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > @@ -416,6 +416,15 @@ static void smu_restore_dpm_user_profile(struct
> smu_context *smu)
> >   		}
> >   	}
> >
> > +	/* Restore customized and committed OD settings */
> > +	if (smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od) {
> > +		if (smu->ppt_funcs->restore_committed_od_settings) {
> > +			ret = smu->ppt_funcs-
> >restore_committed_od_settings(smu);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to upload
> customized OD settings\n");
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> Just thinking if there is a need to handle it ASIC specific. The flags and table
> pointer are maintained in common structure. So can't we do the restore of
> user OD settings directly in this common flow instead of having each ASIC to
> implement the callback?
[Quan, Evan] The OD settings restoring is ASIC specific as it performed on OD table and that(OD table) is ASIC specific.
> 
> >   	/* Disable restore flag */
> >   	smu->user_dpm_profile.flags &=
> ~SMU_DPM_USER_PROFILE_RESTORE;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > index 59ea59acfb00..4752299d7f91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > @@ -2296,39 +2296,45 @@ static int
> navi10_set_default_od_settings(struct smu_context *smu)
> >   		(OverDriveTable_t *)smu->smu_table.boot_overdrive_table;
> >   	int ret = 0;
> >
> > -	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> (void *)od_table, false);
> > +	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> (void
> > +*)boot_od_table, false);
> >   	if (ret) {
> >   		dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to get overdrive table!\n");
> >   		return ret;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt1) {
> > +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt1) {
> >   		ret = navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > -								&od_table-
> >GfxclkVolt1,
> > -								od_table-
> >GfxclkFreq1);
> > +
> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt1,
> > +
> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq1);
> >   		if (ret)
> >   			return ret;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt2) {
> > +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt2) {
> >   		ret = navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > -								&od_table-
> >GfxclkVolt2,
> > -								od_table-
> >GfxclkFreq2);
> > +
> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt2,
> > +
> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq2);
> >   		if (ret)
> >   			return ret;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt3) {
> > +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt3) {
> >   		ret = navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > -								&od_table-
> >GfxclkVolt3,
> > -								od_table-
> >GfxclkFreq3);
> > +
> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt3,
> > +
> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq3);
> >   		if (ret)
> >   			return ret;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	memcpy(boot_od_table, od_table, sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> > +	navi10_dump_od_table(smu, boot_od_table);
> >
> > -	navi10_dump_od_table(smu, od_table);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For S3/S4/Runpm, no need to install boot od table to
> overdrive_table as
> > +	 *   - either they already share the same OD settings on bootup
> > +	 *   - or they have user customized OD settings
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!smu->adev->in_suspend)
> > +		memcpy(od_table, boot_od_table,
> sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> >
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > @@ -2435,6 +2441,14 @@ static int navi10_od_edit_dpm_table(struct
> smu_context *smu, enum PP_OD_DPM_TABL
> >   			dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to import
> overdrive table!\n");
> >   			return ret;
> >   		}
> > +		if (memcmp(table_context->overdrive_table, table_context-
> >boot_overdrive_table,
> > +			sizeof(OverDriveTable_t))) {
> 
> Shouldn't this be - compare against the edited settings and last committed
> settings, overdrive_table vs committed_overdrive_table?
> 
> Basically, user_od_table can be initialized with boot_od settings and the flag
> gives the indication that user_od table is being used or not.
> Before updating, check if the edited table (overdrive_table) and the current
> user_od table are different, then commit the new table.
[Quan, Evan] Yes, I also considered that. But that cannot handle the case below:
1 user made some customizations  -> 2 the customizations were committed -> 3 user restored to default(boot) OD settings(by "echo 'r'") and committed
Although there were some changes between 2 and 3, there is actually no real customized changes compared to default(boot) OD settings.
> 
> > +			smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = true;
> > +			memcpy(table_context-
> >committed_overdrive_table, table_context->overdrive_table,
> > +					sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> > +		} else {
> > +			smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = false;
> > +		}
> >   		break;
> >   	case PP_OD_EDIT_VDDC_CURVE:
> >   		if (!navi10_od_feature_is_supported(od_settings,
> > SMU_11_0_ODCAP_GFXCLK_CURVE)) { @@ -2499,6 +2513,19 @@ static int
> navi10_od_edit_dpm_table(struct smu_context *smu, enum
> PP_OD_DPM_TABL
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > +static int navi10_restore_committed_od_settings(struct smu_context
> > +*smu) {
> > +	struct smu_table_context *table_context = &smu->smu_table;
> > +	void *od_table = table_context->committed_overdrive_table;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> (void *)od_table, true);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to import overdrive
> table!\n");
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> As mentioned before, not sure if this is needed as callback. Even if, this can
> be something common for smuv11, there is nothing ASIC specific in this logic,
> right?
[Quan, Evan] Yes, in patch2 of the series, it was made as a SMUV11 common API.

BR
Evan
> 
> Thanks,
> Lijo
> 
> >   static int navi10_run_btc(struct smu_context *smu)
> >   {
> >   	int ret = 0;
> > @@ -3262,6 +3289,7 @@ static const struct pptable_funcs
> navi10_ppt_funcs = {
> >   	.set_soft_freq_limited_range =
> smu_v11_0_set_soft_freq_limited_range,
> >   	.set_default_od_settings = navi10_set_default_od_settings,
> >   	.od_edit_dpm_table = navi10_od_edit_dpm_table,
> > +	.restore_committed_od_settings =
> > +navi10_restore_committed_od_settings,
> >   	.run_btc = navi10_run_btc,
> >   	.set_power_source = smu_v11_0_set_power_source,
> >   	.get_pp_feature_mask = smu_cmn_get_pp_feature_mask, diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > index 0a5d46ac9ccd..28fc3f17c1b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > @@ -422,10 +422,20 @@ int smu_v11_0_init_smc_tables(struct
> smu_context *smu)
> >   			ret = -ENOMEM;
> >   			goto err3_out;
> >   		}
> > +
> > +		smu_table->committed_overdrive_table =
> > +			kzalloc(tables[SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE].size,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!smu_table->committed_overdrive_table) {
> > +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +			goto err4_out;
> > +		}
> > +
> >   	}
> >
> >   	return 0;
> >
> > +err4_out:
> > +	kfree(smu_table->boot_overdrive_table);
> >   err3_out:
> >   	kfree(smu_table->overdrive_table);
> >   err2_out:
> > @@ -442,12 +452,14 @@ int smu_v11_0_fini_smc_tables(struct
> smu_context *smu)
> >   	struct smu_dpm_context *smu_dpm = &smu->smu_dpm;
> >
> >   	kfree(smu_table->gpu_metrics_table);
> > +	kfree(smu_table->committed_overdrive_table);
> >   	kfree(smu_table->boot_overdrive_table);
> >   	kfree(smu_table->overdrive_table);
> >   	kfree(smu_table->max_sustainable_clocks);
> >   	kfree(smu_table->driver_pptable);
> >   	kfree(smu_table->clocks_table);
> >   	smu_table->gpu_metrics_table = NULL;
> > +	smu_table->committed_overdrive_table = NULL;
> >   	smu_table->boot_overdrive_table = NULL;
> >   	smu_table->overdrive_table = NULL;
> >   	smu_table->max_sustainable_clocks = NULL;
> >


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list