<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Magnus Kessler wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:200903300836.38832.Magnus.Kessler@gmx.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Monday 30 March 2009, Shuang He wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Jesse Barnes wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:20:25 -0400
Kristian Høgsberg <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:krh@bitplanet.net"><krh@bitplanet.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jesse Barnes
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org"><jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Ok, I think this is where the leak was:
__glXUnrefDrawable->DrawableGone->__glXUnrefDrawable. This sequence
meant the glxPriv would stay around (since it was used), but
DrawableGone had generally already disposed of the pDrawable before
the call to Unref, so we never got into DRI2DestroyBuffers, thus
the leak.
The loop seems broken to me. It *looks* like DrawableGone should be
the real free routine, only called when a drawable really is free,
so I've fixed up the code to conform to that. This means removing
the GLX priv frees from DRI and DRI2 routines and putting them here
and using the GLX unref routine everwhere (since it will only free
the resource when the refcount reaches 0).
Any thoughts? I'd appreciate some more testers too... I'm not
quite sure about the generic DoDestroyDrawable change, but if the
refcount is always 1 there anyway it shouldn't make a difference
and seems more correct.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">The __GLXdrawable is a reference counted object, and the glx code
references it in a couple of places: when there's an X resource
pointing to it (a GLXWindow, GLXPixmap or GLXPbuffer) and when it's
the current drawable or readable for a context. The __GLXdrawable is
allocated by the backend in use (dri, dri2 or swrast) and must be
freed by the same backend (don't mix alloc and free across abstraction
barriers). We unref the __GLXdrawable when we either set a different
drawable/readable and when the X resource goes away.
The leak is (as you pointed out before) because we NULL the pDraw
pointer before calling the backend destructor, which then can't unref
the DRI2Drawable, which we then leak. You had the right fix in the
originial post, we just need to not touch glxPriv after
__glXUnrefDrawable if it got destroyed. I suggest this change to
DrawableGone in irc:
refcount = glxPriv->refcount;
__glXUnrefDrawable(glxPriv);
if (refcount > 1) {
glxPriv->pDraw = NULL;
glxPriv->drawId = 0;
}
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Yep, that seems to work too... Magnus or Vasily can you guys confirm?
Thanks,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Memory leak problem seems resolved, but I still see X crash with:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7fd5424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x03155660 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x03157028 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x031925bd in __libc_message () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4 0x031987e4 in malloc_printerr () from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 0x0319c441 in _int_realloc () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 0x0319d176 in realloc () from /lib/libc.so.6
#7 0x08131002 in Xrealloc (ptr=0x6, amount=0) at utils.c:1133
#8 0x0806d10b in dixAllocatePrivate (privates=0x91487c8, key=0xb7e90a3c)
at privates.c:129
#9 0x0806d1cc in dixSetPrivate (privates=0x91487c8, key=0xb7e90a3c,
val=0x0) at privates.c:193
#10 0xb7e8eca1 in DRI2DestroyDrawable (pDraw=0x91487b0) at dri2.c:218
#11 0xb7eee668 in __glXDRIdrawableDestroy (drawable=0x9205ff0) at
glxdri2.c:108 #12 0xb7ee49bb in __glXUnrefDrawable (glxPriv=0x9205ff0) at
glxutil.c:58 #13 0xb7ee3183 in DrawableGone (glxPriv=0x9205ff0,
xid=12583326) at glxext.c:131
#14 0x0806efdc in FreeResource (id=12583326, skipDeleteFuncType=0)
at resource.c:561
#15 0xb7edffa6 in DoDestroyDrawable (cl=<value optimized out>,
glxdrawable=12583326, type=1) at glxcmds.c:1225
#16 0xb7ee340a in __glXDispatch (client=0x8d79db8) at glxext.c:523
#17 0x080874cf in Dispatch () at dispatch.c:437
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#18 0x0806c69d in main (argc=2, argv=0xbf9d2754, envp=Cannot access
memory at address 0xbde
Thanks
--Shuang
) at main.c:397
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I have observed this crash once as well, but haven't yet found a way to
reproduce it. Can you post a few steps that make this crash more likely? On
the bug report (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20704">http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20704</a>) you
mention it has something to do with resizing by small amounts.
Thanks
Magnus
</pre>
</blockquote>
I could easily reproduce this by just resizing the window several
times. Most of times, it's just costing 1 or 2 minutes. <br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
--Shuang<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:200903300836.38832.Magnus.Kessler@gmx.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:xorg@lists.freedesktop.org">xorg@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>