<pre>>Josh Triplett wrote: >> Version 1.1.1 - 2006-11-30 >> >> The "xcompmgr is hard, let's go releasing" release >> >> * Fix Bug #9154 and friends, to unbreak xcompmgr: >> > >I thought xcompmgr was broken and not supported (and I have seen it leak >lots of memory in the X process). I'd _like_ xcompmgr to be improved >and fixed, but is this actually happening? Are people using it? > I'm a lowly user, but I do use xcompmgr and kompmgr all the time (I find them considerably faster and less silly than Beryl/Compiz). If people are interested in improving it, I would suggest having a few more configuration options. For example, it'd be nice to be able to make menus fade, but not windows, or have different settings for menus and windows and also have a way to set a default transparency for menus that isn't applied to windows. I imagine that wouldn't be too hard to add (if I were a little more skilled a programmer, I would do it myself, but my experience with X programming is quite limited, alas). I know many other people are using it, based on talk on the Gentoo forums, btw. </pre>