<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Ikke wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1144063765.15494.4.camel@marslander.trangez.int" type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Just started working on a minor patch for this. Although I doubt it'll be accepted... Who knows ;-) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Attached (sorry for the lag, food etc :-)) Not extensively tested, blablabla. Should I get this into gnome bugzilla? </pre> </blockquote> <blockquote cite="mid1144063765.15494.4.camel@marslander.trangez.int" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">+ /* Keep standard behaviour */ + if (G_LIKELY(g_malloc_failure_handler == NULL)) + { g_error ("%s: failed to allocate %lu bytes", G_STRLOC, n_bytes); + } + else + { + g_warning("%s: failed to allocate %lu bytes", G_STRLOC, n_bytes); + g_malloc_failure_handler (n_bytes); + } } </pre> </blockquote> Not very interesting: 1. You give no way of avoiding the warning 2. You give no way of allocating the memory from somewhere else (e.g. emergency pool, wait & retry...) Why not just: ... + if (g_malloc_failure_handler) + return g_malloc_failure_handler (n_bytes); g_error ("%s: failed to allocate %lu bytes", G_STRLOC, n_bytes); ... </body> </html>