[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties, version 2

[Keith Packard]

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 14:41 +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:

> > I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check
> > to my display color profile management code, but is there a
> > reason to change it ?

Yeah, adopting a consistent standard property set will help applications
in the future as drivers start exposing the standard names.

> I'd have no issues with adding a non-advocated EDID_DATA again to the
> server, if that sounds fit reasonable. Keith?

I'd not encourage non-standard property names for things which we have
standard properties for, that only encourages confusion.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20081218/8fc93872/attachment.pgp>