From aplattner at nvidia.com  Thu Jan  5 10:33:19 2012
From: aplattner at nvidia.com (Aaron Plattner)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:33:19 -0800
Subject: Some patches for xts
In-Reply-To: <1324599800-25074-1-git-send-email-kibi@debian.org>
References: <1324599800-25074-1-git-send-email-kibi@debian.org>
Message-ID: <4F05ECEF.2050402@nvidia.com>

On 12/22/2011 04:23 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this series should be somehow easy to review. That one might be a bit
> controversial, but I'm proposing it anyway, just in case:
>
>    [PATCH:xts 6/6] Remove old files from the TET3 import.

As discussed, I dropped #1 and merged the rest:

To git+ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/test/xts
    141d7e2..7032632  master -> master

> I was also tempted to merge Artistic and Licence into COPYING, but there
> are *tons* of references in source files, so shrug?

Yeah, I don't know what the right approach is.

> BTW, it looks like TET is still alive:
>    http://tetworks.opengroup.org/tet/
>
> Are there any plans to update what got copied from tet 3.3?

Interesting.  I have no plans to do that.  Do you know if there are any major 
benefits over what we have here?

We seem to be getting a proliferation of test frameworks, with the unit tests 
and Google Test now entering the ring.  I'd argue that we should keep new X 
integration test development in XTS, but its syntax is awfully arcane.  I'd love 
to hear feedback from other developers.

-- Aaron

From aplattner at nvidia.com  Thu Jan  5 13:37:29 2012
From: aplattner at nvidia.com (Aaron Plattner)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:37:29 -0800
Subject: xorg-test@lists.x.org reply-to munging
Message-ID: <4F061819.6090404@nvidia.com>

I'd like to start using xorg-test at lists.x.org for XTS development, and noticed 
that it adds a reply-to header directing traffic to itself.  I filed a bug to 
have that behavior disabled, but was asked to get consensus on the list first. 
I'm not sure what the right way to conduct a vote here is.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44500