<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - radeon: allow the user to set a maximum HDMI pixel clock (in MHz) by a kernel parameter" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93885#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - radeon: allow the user to set a maximum HDMI pixel clock (in MHz) by a kernel parameter" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93885">bug 93885</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> Alex Deucher</a> <pre>(In reply to Elmar Stellnberger from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93885#c7">comment #7</a>) > Likewise for the G96M [GeForce 9600M GT] nobody would have believe that > this card can yield 3840x2160, be it with 23Hz or 46Hz interlaced. Gonna > provide the logs tomorrow when the computer with the XFX radeon card is free > for testing. Just wanna tell that I still hope for a similar radeon tuning > parameter like hdmimhz. That hw was not designed to support 4k over hdmi. If you want to hack the driver, you are welcome to (take a look at radeon_dvi_mode_valid()), but it's not something I want to enable or support out of the box. If you break your card or monitor, you get to keep the pieces.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>