<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Xserver does not detect Fiji Radeon R9 Nano. Modesetting set to wrong resolution." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92045#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Xserver does not detect Fiji Radeon R9 Nano. Modesetting set to wrong resolution." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92045">bug 92045</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:adf.lists@gmail.com" title="Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>"> Andy Furniss</a> <pre>(In reply to charlie from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92045#c9">comment #9</a>) > I don't know what you mean by, "as AFAIK you get newer/different/better? > glamor over using the "old" driver/glamor." Do you mean I don't have to > compile "driver/glamor" if I build xserver with "--enable-glamor" flag which > is the newer method of building X? I will try it now. Yes AFAIK. If you have Xorg.0.logs before and after you should be able to see a difference in module version like - grep glamoregl /var/log/Xorg.0.log -A 1 [ 23.286] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl" [ 23.332] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so [ 23.450] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 23.450] compiled for 1.17.99, module version = 1.0.0 I don't have an old log, but IIRC if you are using the driver/glamor you will see a different/lower version. <a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/log/">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/log/</a> shows no updates for > a year. As for your dp res issue - I can't help there, I have a different card + no dp monitor to test.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>