<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HDMI TV interlaced modes slightly wrong." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HDMI TV interlaced modes slightly wrong." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35970">bug 35970</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:adf.lists@gmail.com" title="Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>"> Andy Furniss</a> <pre>(In reply to Alex Deucher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c14">comment #14</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113797" name="attach_113797" title="possible fix">attachment 113797</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113797&action=edit" title="possible fix">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=35970&attachment=113797'>[review]</a> [review] > possible fix > > (In reply to Andy Furniss from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c10">comment #10</a>) > > > > Before this patch testing with R9270X I see the same as I did with with an > > HD4890 in that normal clock modes are almost OK apart from a bit of wrap > > around/dup from bottom line to top, low res double clock modes = trash, but > > then it's not implemented. > > Does this patch fix doublescan? I can try later but shouldn't it be DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK ?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>