<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HDMI TV interlaced modes slightly wrong." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HDMI TV interlaced modes slightly wrong." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35970">bug 35970</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:adf.lists@gmail.com" title="Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>"> Andy Furniss</a> <pre>(In reply to Alex Deucher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c11">comment #11</a>) > (In reply to Andy Furniss from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=35970#c10">comment #10</a>) > > The commit in agd5f drm-next-4.1-wip - > > > > 2c1ecad111c82450d715929c12ac9511010d3b6c > > > > drm/radeon: fix interlaced modes > > The viewport needs the frame size, not the field size. > > > > Makes things worse for me. > > > > Does your TV have any native interlaces modes? If so, do those work? I.e., > are there only problems with manually added interlaces modes? I think there > is some inconsistency with how the vertical timing is stored (whether it is > frames or fields) across modelines. They are all native (cea vic) modes - I don't add any now. I guess the xrandr/adding in this bug from 2011 was before xorg/whatever handled CEA properly.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>