<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Consider re-enabling glamor on at least R500" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75709#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Consider re-enabling glamor on at least R500" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75709">bug 75709</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> Michel Dänzer</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75709#c1">comment #1</a>) > I reverted it and tried glamor on my RV530. It's working fine, only having > some corruption with Xv on some video (same as <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - xv playback on glamor shows wrong colors" href="show_bug.cgi?id=72821">bug #72821</a> or <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - screen corruption with XVideo output in VLC" href="show_bug.cgi?id=74811">bug #74811</a> > reported for other chipsets), Which glamor version/tree/branch did you try? X -retro fails to start with current glamor Git on my RV350: Failed to link: error: shader uses too many varying components (44 > 40) (EE) Fatal server error: (EE) GLSL link failure AFAICT this limit is the same for all GPUs supported by r300g. > also gtkperf is slower on Lines and Circles > (I'll try again when the 36 patches posted on glamor ML get merged), They don't affect gtkperf according to my tests with radeonsi. But FWIW they should make core text rendering (e.g. used by xterm and some other terminal emulators by default) faster than with EXA. > Also according to glamor source it just needs OpenGL 1.3: > <a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/tree/src/glamor.c#n311">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/tree/src/glamor.c#n311</a> Even if that's still true, r300g advertises OpenGL 2.1 support, and with that glamor uses GLSL shaders which are too complex for the hardware supported by r300g. It might be possible to fix that, but someone would have to put in the effort.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>