<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - radeonsi with glamor has very poor performance with primitives drawing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68524#c29">Comment # 29</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - radeonsi with glamor has very poor performance with primitives drawing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68524">bug 68524</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:awatry@gmail.com" title="Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>"> Aaron Watry</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=68524#c27">comment #27</a>) > That's a nice improvement in performance, but it's still an order of > magnitude slower than EXA, so I feel it would be better to either go > directly for full-blown shader-based acceleration of diagonal lines, or to > work on improving the performance of software fallbacks in general. No argument there. I figured that there was no real chance of my patch getting committed long-term, just figured that it partially mitigates the worst of the problem for now. If we can extend glamor to handle shader-based lines or improve the software fallbacks, great... it's just beyond what I feel comfortable with at the moment (my background is more OpenCL, not GL, and I just took my first real look at the glamor code this morning).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>