<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - regression in vt-switching between x servers with ums radeon driver"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66812#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - regression in vt-switching between x servers with ums radeon driver"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66812">bug 66812</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:avg@icyb.net.ua" title="Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>"> <span class="fn">Andriy Gapon</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Looking at eb6d769a087b2ed5952f477fc3f0b0625810a287 it seems that it does a
little bit more than the commit message says.
Whereas previously there was an early return from radeon_crtc_dpms():
if ((mode == DPMSModeOn) && radeon_crtc->enabled)
return;
now there isn't one in radeon_*do*_crtc_dpms().
So now, when radeon_do_crtc_dpms is called RADEONRestore() it's always executed
to the completion even when mode == DPMSModeOn && radeon_crtc->enabled already.
Note sure if this was intended.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>