<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Poor xterm/exa perf with ColorTiling on."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34486#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Poor xterm/exa perf with ColorTiling on."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34486">bug 34486</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> <span class="fn">Michel Dänzer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=34486#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> But it's just as slow as the non-fontconfig bitmap font rendering.</span >
When using Xft, the X server only receives pixel data for the font glyphs, so
it couldn't discriminate between different font types even if it wanted to. So
I suspect either your terminal still ends up not using Xft for the font you
choose, or it/Xft/... is doing something else differently between different
font types that makes the difference.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>