Michael should really be running xf86-video-ati and libdrm from git and
latest kernel-rcX, otherwise the perfomance will continue to suck in his
articles.<br>
<br>
There are performance improvements and there will be more as time goes by, but
the majority of them is and will be disabled with old kernels and DDX drivers.<br><br>-Marek<br><br>On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Andres Cimmarusti <<a href="mailto:andrescimmarusti@yahoo.com">andrescimmarusti@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> ATI R300 Mesa, Gallium3D vs Catalyst<br>> <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ati_r300_current&num=1">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ati_r300_current&num=1</a><br>
><br>> ATI R500 Mesa vs Catalyst<br>> <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_lts_graphics&num=1">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_lts_graphics&num=1</a><br>
><br>> The first benchmark depressed me, as I have one of these cards...<br>><br>> Andres<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> xorg-driver-ati mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org">xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati">http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati</a><br>><br><br>