<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.32.2"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 10:32 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <PRE> On 09/09/11 18:24, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > Revision histories are not used, only 3 docs out of 63 have one. > > Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon<<A HREF="mailto:memsize@videotron.ca">memsize@videotron.ca</A>> > --- > doc/ICElib.xml | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/ICElib.xml b/doc/ICElib.xml > index 77a8965..2adf2ee 100644 > --- a/doc/ICElib.xml > +++ b/doc/ICElib.xml > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ > <copyright><year>1993</year><holder>X Consortium</holder></copyright> > <copyright><year>1994</year><holder>X Consortium</holder></copyright> > <copyright><year>1996</year><holder>X Consortium</holder></copyright> > -<revhistory><revision><revnumber>1.0</revnumber><date></date></revision></revhistory> The revhistory seems wrong, especially since we're not giving any history, but I think we should still preserve somewhere that this is the 1.0 spec. releaseinfo? edition? I don't remember off hand what most of the other docs use. </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> There are 66 instances of "releaseinfo" but one for "edition". Mostly "Version 1.0" or similar. In addition, many have a second releaseinfo set to "X Version 11, Release 6.4" or similar. Should 6.4 be update to the current release for each new release? It is probably impossible to find which exact X release the doc is for. </BODY> </HTML>