<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.32.2"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <TT>Also, I'm not sure if looking for a version number is a very good way to</TT> <TT>check for bugs.  People backport bug fixes all the time, and introduce</TT> <TT>new bugs all the time.</TT> </BLOCKQUOTE> Right. It was not my intention to test for bugs. The objective is to specify a minimum version that will correctly build the docbooks. I recall the reason for specifying "no" was because fop was crashing (which I verified to be the case). I thought that asking for 1.0 was a general improvement over the current situation. As with any other tool it is not a promise that it will work correctly, all the time. on all platforms, for all documents. Help me chose the lesser of the two evils. I have no problem keeping the "no". This works, but looks silly: <BLOCKQUOTE> <PRE> XORG_WITH_FOP([1.0],[no]) </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> Suggestions, votes? <BLOCKQUOTE> <PRE> XORG_WITH_FOP([],[no])? </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> Note there is a similar situation with xmlto 0.0.22. The text output is garbled with 0.0.21. Same for doxygen. When build often crashes due to docs, there is a vocal crowd demanding that all docs be banned from the build. Then nobody has any docs and nothing gets tested. Thanks for your interest. </BODY> </HTML>