<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 09:12 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">asciidoc also converts to docbook. so while there would be some</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">inconsistency, it wouldn't be that bad.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
I thought about that. The strategy would that before it matures, asciidoc provides<BR>
a "rapid development process". At one point a more formal docbook version is produced<BR>
with all the bells and whistles and integration with the rest of the documentation.<BR>
<BR>
I tried with the makefile to get a feel for how it builds and look. It is an improvement<BR>
over the flat file.
</BODY>
</HTML>