<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 18:20 +0200, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:50:16AM -0500, ext Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 10:16 -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> >
> > Can I trouble you to add in the commit text the motivation for adding
> > this app?
> > I generally like to comment why packages are added/removed from
> > build.sh.
...
> I was under the assumption that this app is an X.Org app, but it has a
> GNU General Public License which I vaguely recall not being appropriate
> for X.Org.
> Would this app be released along all the other ones on the X.Org
> website?
>
> There is a lot of configuration upgrade to do, but this app may abide by
> other rules.
Are we releasing only MIT based stuff within katamari?
if build.sh matches exactly what gets released in X katamari then this patch
probably is invalid. Are we doing in such way?
Tiago
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I am not sure what "MIT based stuff" means, but I just did a grep on everything in build.sh<BR>
and I see no GNU General Public License except for mesa, which is not an X.Org module.<BR>
<BR>
The latest LICENSING is here: <A HREF="http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.6/doc/xorg-docs/License.html">http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.6/doc/xorg-docs/License.html</A><BR>
It does not say anything about about GNU GPL. I just recall some discussion on the list to the effect<BR>
that this license is too restrictive.<BR>
<BR>
The problem I see with it's inclusion in build.sh is that it is error prone from a maintenance point of view.<BR>
How is anyone supposed to know this module is different from all the other ones. Updating COPYING is different,<BR>
the standard README would probably not point to X.Org, and so on.<BR>
<BR>
I started upgrading the configuration with some standard pre-reviewed xorg stuff, <BR>
so I will probably have to revert the patches.<BR>
<BR>
Build.sh contains more than a katamari. It's all xorg modules + mesa/xcb/keyboard-config/pixman<BR>
and a number modules that are not in high demand or near obsolete.
</BODY>
</HTML>