<p>I wasn't going to say anything, but I have an XGI Volari hanging on my wall with a Dx9 sticker on it. I've just been too lazy/incompetent/indifferent/much of an AMD whore to get started on KMS for it. My Didj and Ego share a similar fate, along with other various video cards. Modern and rare things do exist.</p>
<p>Sending from a mobile, pardon the brevity. ~ C.</p>
<p>On Nov 25, 2010 12:17 PM, "Luc Verhaegen" <<a href="mailto:libv@skynet.be">libv@skynet.be</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:14:36PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:<br>>> <br>
>> We provide pretty much no support for hardware that's the same vintage <br>>> as the monitors you're talking about. Why would the people using these <br>>> monitors be running current versions of X? Why would they not be able to <br>
>> write an xorg.conf? Why are they more important than the people who have <br>>> to deal with the more common cases of missing EDID?<br>> <br>> If this really is how you feel about the thing, then be consistent, and <br>
> rm -Rf everything except -intel, -ati and -nouveau. Because in your <br>> world, no-one would be running anything else.<br>> <br>> Luc Verhaegen.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> <a href="mailto:xorg-devel@lists.x.org">xorg-devel@lists.x.org</a>: X.Org development<br>
> Archives: <a href="http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel">http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel</a><br>> Info: <a href="http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel">http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel</a><br>
</p>