<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:59 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">1) It is *NOT* a warning flag. Using CWARNFLAGS should *only* enable warnings, not change the resulting assembly.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">2) It was never intended to be in all of the modules. It landed there by accident when the code was copy/pasted from one configure.ac to another and then into util-macros.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">3) Performance gains are not in consideration here.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
I totally agree, but it does not justify simply removing the offending flag as if it had never existed. It does have an impact on the binaries, some modules need it, other don't, but we don't know which ones for sure. That's my understanding, I could be wrong.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Sorry I missed your latest post, came late. I'll get back to you.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks
</BODY>
</HTML>