<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:50 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Yes. That is what I intend to do, but I want to get in one regression fix first which I'm asking someone to verify first.</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Of course.<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a"> I intend to have out 1.9.2 with the correct util-macros tomorrow.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> It is crucial that the</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> published tarball can be reproduced by anyone from git and does not</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> contain any private fix, intended or accidental.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">I agree.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> I would like to keep the two issues separate for the sake of clarity. I</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> completely agree that this option should have never been included in</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> CWARNFLAGS. However, not everyone agrees the code should be compiled</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> without it. We could resume the discussion on this topic on it's own</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> thread, as it is a complex issue.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Ok, I'll start a new thread for that.</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
My brain is grateful.<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">--Jeremy</FONT></TT>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>