<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:57 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <TT>That sounds okay to me. Note that if you invoke "build.sh -L" it will</TT> <TT>output this list for you. If that a useful feature? Could that feature</TT> <TT>be used by other build systems?</TT> </BLOCKQUOTE> I am not sure, I have the impression you think there is only one list of modules (as I once did). So, yes, the -L will output the list. Where does that list comes from? It's hard coded in build.sh. Is that list useful to everyone? No. Are there many valid and useful lists out there? Yes. Can I start a build using one of the many lists I have in mind? No. That's the feature I have in mind. Even better if the modules lists can be in a format that other tools can understand (data integration). It took me quite a while to figure out that there is no "fixed and cast in stone" list of modules in xorg. Compare the number of modules in the freedesktop repositories with the list in build.sh and the lists in tinderbox. That will give you an idea of the many ways to slice and dice xorg. I'll have a look at your patch later today. Thanks! Gaetan </BODY> </HTML>