<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 23:04 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">The last time I tried to work on too many things at once they got</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">applied in an order I wasn't expecting so reports came back my patches</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">wouldn't apply (which doesn't make me look so good). So this time I'll</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">just wait patiently for things to be applied before submitting new</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">patches.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">So far the list of patches I have ready include:</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I have pushed the one I said I would. As for the others, I was under the impression you would<BR>
repost the remaining patches. Include any review tags you may have received. The last issue I recall is that<BR>
the patches were bash specific and not as portable as sh. I also had noted there were too many changes<BR>
in one patch.<BR>
<BR>
It would be easier for reviewers if you posted a new series in sequence that runs under /bin/sh and<BR>
incorporated feedback from previous review.
</BODY>
</HTML>