<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 19:54 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <TT>Since I've been working with the module build script I thought it</TT> <TT>would be prudent to make modifications to the wiki in an attempt to</TT> <TT>keep it in sync. But since I'm new around here it seems kinda rude to</TT> <TT>just go ahead and make whatever changes without some sort of review.</TT> <TT>Is there some sort of review process similar to the git patches to the</TT> <TT>mailing list for making changes to the wiki?</TT> </BLOCKQUOTE> I went through the same thinking. There is no specific process for wikis. My general reading on the matter is that you edit the wiki and others can correct if they think it is wrong. Common sense and good working ethics are always welcome. In the example you provide, the changes to the build script have already been reviewed. Make sure you test the sample code you may provide and keep in mind various platforms install stuff in different places. Enjoy! </BODY> </HTML>