<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 14:54 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">understand so much the reason for that). So "remove ISA bus code, as support</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">is removed from xserver" is not the argument. </FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Agreed<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">On the other hand, we don't have a policy defined to deprecate a given</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">functionality of a driver after a given time or versions. So we could go now</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">and deprecate ISA from there easily.</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
The ISA bus support was removed from server end of 2008. I thought people would have complained by now if their computer with ISA bus would not work any more. Some of them must have upgraded to server 1.6. But it's just a guessing game.<BR>
<BR>
The motivation for this patch is simply for clean-up, not big deal, but I have noticed functional maintenance work in this area. Removing dead code can save maintenance, if we can be sure it's really dead.<BR>
<BR>
It would be useful to have an up-to-date PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XORG, [xorg-server >= ????] statement in each driver. It would tell developers how far back to check for compatibility.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks
</BODY>
</HTML>