Hello, I have accelerated fillrect and bitBlit operations in KDrive using KAA. After analysing the performance improvement using x11perf tool in some test cases like rect500, copywinwin500 the performance got improved considerably (20 times for rect500 and 6 times for copywinwin500). But when i run the GtkPerf tool to analyse the performance improvement at Gtk level there is almost no difference between accelerated and unaccelerated servers. Even in some cases related to drawing circles the performance decreased. I have observed that the calls of fillrect and bitBlit are getting routed through the Kaa hooks fine for most of the test cases (GtkEntry to GtkTextView). But for test cases related to GtkDrawingArea no call is getting routed through KAA callback hooks. My question is why is the performance improvement shown through x11perf is not getting reflected when we run gtkperf?? Cant the performance improvement acheived through hardware aceeleration using KAA would be visible in a Gtk application running over KDrive?? please provide your valuable inputs.