<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
David Miller wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20090327.183242.113691701.davem@davemloft.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">From: Gerry Reno <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:greno@verizon.net"><greno@verizon.net></a>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:30:44 -0400
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">David Miller wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have more than once accidently hit those keys and lost all of my
work.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">User training required.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I've been using an X desktop for more than 15 years.
Unfortunately I have not been given perfect fingers.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<tt>And how does this at all justify thrusting a huge unneeded change
on the overall Linux community? In over thirty years of working with
*nix systems, never once has a user complained that Ctrl-Alt-Backspace
has caused them any problems. It's one thing to make a change in
response to a documented need, and it's quite another to let some
minority group dictate a change that causes a huge change for the
overall majority. This change is just wrong. It cannot be justified.
I see nothing anywhere on the internet or in the threads calling for
such a change. And if it was a true problem you would find references
to it.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Gerry<br>
<br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>