reviewed policy

[Michel Dänzer]

On Mit, 2012-12-05 at 23:14 +0100, Daniel Martin wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> here's a question that I carry around for some time:
> 
> What's the policy on signing something with "Reviewed-by:"? Does it
> mean:
> a) I've read the patch carefully and don't see any problems.
>    (i.e. for small and ovious fixes)
> and/or
> b) I've read the patch carefully and tested it.

Reviewed-by: doesn't imply testing, there's Tested-by: for that.

Does this answer your question?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer