Bus layer cleanups

[Jeremy Huddleston]

Comparing the end result of this patchset before and after the cleanup reveals this change.  Was this intentional or did something slip through when restructuring?

$ git diff c70241de29ae9c80a89be29e16b838b14a83445e 5057dc2020e8854a97570442bc897a87b4fb8ac2
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.c b/hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.c
index 2ce6352..aab2ae2 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.c
@@ -1707,6 +1707,7 @@ vgaHWGetHWRec(ScrnInfoPtr scrp)
     hwp->MapSize = 0;
     hwp->pScrn = scrp;
 
+    hwp->PIOOffset = scrp->domainIOBase;
     hwp->dev = xf86GetPciInfoForEntity(scrp->entityList[0]);
 
     return TRUE;

On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Jamey Sharp <jamey at minilop.net> wrote:
>>> I've built each patch in the series and minimally tested that each
>>> resulting server works with the xf86-video-nested driver, a window
>>> manager, and an xterm. That means I'm not testing most of the changed
>>> code paths, but I'm doing what I can on this airplane...
>>> 
>>> Patches 3 and 4 don't compile because 'scrp' is not in scope in
>>> vgaHWSetStdFuncs. The series fixes it in patch 5 by deleting this
>>> reference to hwp->PIOOffset and scrp->domainIOBase entirely, but bisect
>>> fails on these two.
>>> 
>>> Patches 14 and 15 introduce some warnings like:
>>> 
>>> vgaHW.c:1761:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pci_device_map_legacy'
>> 
>> These things I'll handle. I'll send another email with an updated branch.
>> 
>> Matt
> 
> Dropped patch 3 and rebased patches 4 and 5. Pushed to the same
> branch, git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/xserver ioaddress
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt
> 

---
Jeremy Huddleston

Rebuild Sudan
 - Board of Directors
 - http://www.rebuildsudan.org

Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology
 - Advisory Board
 - http://www.bfoit.org